First Nations: NEB review of Kinder Morgan pipeline “fatally flawed”
“We’ve been invisible on our land for far too long.”
Twelve British Columbia First Nations have told the Harper government that the National Energy Board’s review of Kinder Morgan’s $5.4-billion Trans Mountain Expansion Project was “fatally flawed and superficial.”
“We are highly concerned that the Crown has failed to implement a process to meaningfully consult First Nations,” the First Nations said in an open letter released last week. “Rather than working with First Nations, the Crown has acted unilaterally and stated it will rely, to the extent possible, on the NEB Hearing for the Project to identify, consider and address impacts on Aboriginal rights, including Treaty rights and fulfill its legal duty to consult. This approach is inadequate for a number of reasons.”
Kinder Morgan currently operates the Trans Mountain pipeline, which runs from the heart of the tar sands in Alberta, through several traditional First Nations territories, to Washington state in the U.S. In December 2013, the energy giant applied to the NEB to build a twin pipeline running from Alberta to Burnaby, B.C. If approved, the expansion would boost oil flow from the current 300,000 barrels per day to 890,000.
The First Nations’ letter, addressed to Natural Resources Minister Greg Rickford and cceed to Prime Minister Stephen Harper, NEB Chair Peter Watson and the leaders of the federal parties, adds to the strengthening public opposition to the pipeline.
In a strongly-worded letter issued in August, Band Chief Aaron L. Sam blasted Harper for supporting project while ignoring climate change and concerns about the increased risk of oil spills. In June last year, the NEB confirmed a crude oil leak from the current Trans Mountain pipeline in the B.C. Lower Nicola Indian Band’s traditional territory.
Last week, the RCMP arrested more than 90 people protesting the pipeline on Burnaby Mountain and laid civil contempt charges against them. The BC Civil Liberties Association says the “arrests may have been illegitimate.”
Here’s the full text of the First Nations’ letter:
To: Hon. Greg Rickford
Minister of Natural Resources
21st Floor, 580 Booth Street, Room C7-1
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0E4
cc.: Prime Minister Stephen Harper, NEB Chair Peter Watson
28 November, 2014
We are the original stewards of this land and we continue to have a sacred obligation to protect our
waters, lands and people. We are united in expressing our grave concerns about how the regulatory
review of the Trans Mountain Expansion Project is unfolding. We call for vast improvements to that
review process and to how First Nations will be consulted regarding the Project.
We are highly concerned that the Crown has failed to implement a process to meaningfully consult First Nations even though the National Energy Board (NEB) review is well underway. Rather than working with First Nations, the Crown has acted unilaterally and stated it will rely, to the extent possible, on the NEB Hearing for the Project to identify, consider and address impacts on Aboriginal rights, including Treaty rights and fulfill its legal duty to consult. This approach is inadequate for a number of reasons.
First, the Crown failed to consult First Nations about the design of the overall framework for the review. As a result, the environmental assessment being carried out by the NEB will fail to fully consider or assess potential adverse impacts on Aboriginal title, rights, including Treaty rights or interests and will not, therefore, provide the Crown with the information it requires.
Second, as a quasi-judicial tribunal that operates much like a court, the NEB cannot consult with First Nations and accommodate our concerns, as the honour of the Crown requires. But while it has the powers of a court, in this proceeding the NEB has determined that no Trans Mountain witnesses will be cross-examined. Instead, Trans Mountain must answer written “information requests”, which have proven to be a wholly inadequate substitute. The result will be a fatally flawed and superficial review.
Third, the federal Crown is providing a woefully insufficient amount of capacity funding relative to the complexity of the Project and the magnitude of its impacts. We are being required to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars from our limited budgets so that the Crown can seek to rely on this process to fulfill its constitutional duty to consult us. This is not honourable.
Fourth, the Crown has failed to provide any guidance as to if or how consultation will occur after the NEB makes a recommendation to Cabinet about the Proposal. In any event, it will be too late at that point to consult us about the Proposal and attempt to accommodate our concerns.
The bottom line is that the undersigned First Nations are wholly dissatisfied with the Crown’s approach to consultation in relation to the Project. We do not believe that the Crown’s approach is consistent with its constitutional duties to First Nations.
We call on the Crown to work with us to develop a meaningful consultation process for review of the Project. To begin the discussion, we request a meeting with you on an urgent basis to map out a constructive and pragmatic path forward.
Chief Nelson Leon, Adams Lake Indian Band
Chief Susan Miller, Katzie First Nation
Chief Marilyn Gabriel, Kwantlen First Nation
Chief Wayne Sparrow, Musqueam Indian Band
Chief Norma Webb, Peters Band
Chief Percy Joe, Shackan Indian Band
Chief Ian Campbell, Squamish Nation
Jesse James, Shxw’ōwhámel First Nation
Chief Gordon Planes, T’Sou-ke Nation
Chief Harvey Underwood, Tsawout First Nation
Chief Maureen Thomas, Tsleil-Waututh Nation
Chief Harvey McLeod, Upper Nicola Indian Band
Latest posts by Obert Madondo (see all)
- Archbishop Tutu condemns Aung San Suu Kyi’s silence on Myanmar’s genocidal violence against Rohingya Muslims - September 10, 2017
- Canada and “Five Eyes” spying partners must respect strong encryption - August 4, 2017
- NDP demands investigation into allegations of racism, homophobia and Islamophobia at CSIS - July 17, 2017
- Why the July 12 net neutrality day of action in the United States matters - July 12, 2017