Senate expenses scandal: New RCMP docs suggest Harper is “guilty of corruption”

Share on twitter Tweet
Share on facebook Share

Senate expenses scandal: New RCMP docs suggest Harper is “guilty of corruption”

by: Obert Madondo | Published Thur. Nov 21, 2013

Stephen Harper by Remy Steinegger 219x3006 Senate expenses scandal: New RCMP docs suggest Harper is guilty of corruption

Stephen Harper. (Photo: Remy Steinegger)

New documents released by the RCMP suggest that the Senate expenses scandal is closing in on Prime Minister Stephen Harper and the Conservatives.

For Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau, the documents show that Harper, who came to office in 2006 promising to clean up Ottawa, is “guilty of corruption.”

The documents, filed in court on Wednesday, allege that Harper’s former chief of staff, Nigel Wright, violated the Criminal Code when he cut a $90,172 cheque to cover up Sen. Mike Duffy’s fraudulent Senate expense claims. The documents allege that Wright committed several offences relating to fraud, bribery, and breach of trust.

Most importantly, the RCMP documents suggest that Harper and a whole busload of senior Conservatives knew a lot more than the PM has publicly admitted. CTV news reports that “PMO staff worked with Duffy to make his politically inconvenient expense problems go away.”

In essence, when Harper said he knew nothing of the deal, he lied to Canadians. There was a high-profile cover-up and he was aware of it.

As Postmedia News reports: 

And while Wright is quoted in the RCMP documents saying that the prime minister was not aware of his plan to cut a $90,000 cheque from his personal funds to assist Duffy – a point on which Harper is also adamant – other parts of the RCMP records suggest Harper had more knowledge of Duffy’s woes and the widening scandal than the prime minister has publicly spoken about. The documents also suggest Harper may have known at a key point in the affair that the party was willing to pick up the tab for Duffy’s housing expenses.

One email, which is part of the RCMP documents, suggests that Wright’s decision to cut the cheque wasn’t his alone. That he either consulted with or sought Harper’s signature before he acted.

“We are good to go from the PM,” Wright says in the email, dated February 22, 2012.

In another email, Wright seems to suggest that the Conservatives in the Senate weren’t doing enough to contain the scandal as efficiently as the PM expected.

“We cannot rely on the Senate leadership,” he writes in the February 15 email. “We have to do this in a way that does not lead to the Chinese water torture of new facts in the public domain that the PM does not want.”

The RCMP documents also speak of an “agreement” around the dirty deal.

“That agreement, to give and accept money in exchange for something to be done or omitted to be done, constitutes the bribery offence,” the documents say. “They used their offices for a dishonest purpose, other than the public good.”

The documents also reveal that the following senior Conservatives knew about the deal:

Sen. Marjory LeBreton, Government Leader in the Senate

Sen. David Tkachuk, Chair of the Senate Standing Committee

Sen. Carolyn Stewart Olsen, Member of the Senate Standing Committee

Andrew MacDougall, Director of Communications, Prime Minister’s Office

Benjamin Perrin, Legal Counsel to the Prime Minister

Ray Novak, Harper’s Deputy Chief of Staff

Carl Vallee, Press Secretary, Prime Minister’s Office

Arthur Hamilton, Legal Counsel, Conservative Party of Canada

Chris Woodcock, Director of Issues Management, Prime Minister’s Office

I’d no idea. That’s because the Conservatives didn’t wan’t us to know.

But most insulting is this: before the newest revelations, Harper’s official response has read like a page from a dictator’s operational manual. Denial. Finger-pointing. Smearing. Character assassination. The works.

Soon after the scandal broke out, the PM expressed confidence in Wright.  In May, Harper told us Wright had acted “in the public interest” when he cut the Duffy cheque. He even “fought to keep Nigel Wright”.

“The prime minister had full confidence in Mr. Wright and Mr. Wright is staying on,” said Andrew MacDougall, Harper’s director of communications then.

Then the scandal refused to go away, threatened to engulf the Conservatives, and the smear campaign began. Harper made both Wright and Duffy the fall guys. He blamed them. Then he publicly trashed them.

In the House of Commons in October, Harper depicted Wright as a crooked political operator who actively engaged in a deception that duped his boss along with all Canadians.

Harper recently also painted Sen. Duffy as “a duplicitous crook”. That’s soon after Duffy told us “the prime minister wasn’t interested in explanations or the truth.”

In a speech delivered to the Senate in October, Duffy alleged Harper told him to repay the fraudulently claimed expenses. He claimed that he met both Harper and Wright.

This is how the Toronto Star’s Tim Harper characterizes the stubborn scandal and its inevitable impact on Harper:

It is an indictment of his leadership and an indelible stain on his office, its bully-boy tactics and its apparent view that it can bulldoze through any problem with a wink, a payoff and a carefully rehearsed narrative.

Canadians deserve the truth. Now!

Obert Madondo is an Ottawa-based progressive blogger, and the founder and editor of The Canadian Progressive. Follow him on Twitter.com/Obiemad 

 Senate expenses scandal: New RCMP docs suggest Harper is guilty of corruption
Obert Madondo is an Ottawa-based independent journalist, progressive political blogger, and activist. He’s the publisher and editor of The Canadian Progressive blog.
, , , , ,
  • NadineLumley

    Well, Mr. Lawyer, Elections Canada charged Senator Irving
    Gerstein with FRAUD under the Elections Canada Act in 2011 where Con LAWYERS
    simply plea-bargained him off by having the CPC pay a fine: http://bit.ly/vC97GA
    while he walked!
    Gerstein should have been charged in his 2006 election FRAUD
    scam under the Criminal Code where, once his guilt was determined, he would
    have been sentenced in a Criminal Court and not some quasi judicial process
    under little used and toothless federal legislation.
    If the RCMP charge Wright under the Criminal Code, then they
    have to charge Gerstein with the same section as the evidence indicates he was
    going to go $30,000 plus Duffy’s lawyer expenses to MAKE THE DUFFY FRAUD GO AWAY!
    And surely this lawyer would have figured out by now that it
    was Gerstein and Wright that hatched the plot whereby that Wright pays the $90K
    NOW and then Gerstein would hide $90K in election campaign expenses in 2015
    with which to pay back Wright with interest LATER!
    Gerstein feared trying to hide this $90K on the Con books
    just ahead of the fall Conservative Party convention in Calgary — if found
    out, there would be party membership backlash.
    So Gerstein and Wright should both be charged criminally as
    both were holding each others hand in the Duffy pay-off scam!”
    http://huffingtonpost.ca/social/MyTake/nigel-wright-rcmp-duffy-senate-scandal_n_4566272_304944813.html

  • lbran

    I suspect you have no interest in the truth. Most likely interested in destroying the conservatives – not the truth.