City of Nanaimo asks to be excluded from CETA
Council of Canadians celebrates vote for transparency and democracy
NANAIMO, B.C. – The Council of Canadians and its Mid Island chapter are celebrating a decision by City Council last night to demand a permanent exemption for the City from the Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA).
Over 40 municipal councils, school boards or associations, including large cities like Toronto, Hamilton, Mississauga and Victoria, have sought similar protections.
“We congratulate the City of Nanaimo for standing up for local jobs and local democracy.” says Paul Manly from the Mid Island chapter of the Council of Canadians. This resolution comes at a pivotal moment in the negotiations. “The truth is there’s no benefit to Canadian municipalities for being shackled by international trade restrictions on their local policy and spending powers. Cities are Harper’s bargaining chips in these EU negotiations – they should have a right to say no to CETA,” says Maude Barlow, National Chairperson of the Council of Canadians.
Last night, Nanaimo councillors voted to ask the federal government for an exemption from CETA.
As written, the CETA procurement rules would forbid a city, town, school board or other body included in the deal from preferring one bidding firm over another based on how much of the content in a certain project was local or Canadian. CETA would also ban municipalities from considering local development benefits when choosing between different bidding firms, whether they were Canadian or European. It’s up to the Province of British Columbia to decide whether Nanaimo and other cities will be bound by these rules.
“It doesn’t make sense for a province like B.C. to take away important job-creating tools from its cities,” says Barlow. “Public procurement is one of the last places where a local government can play a role in fostering sustainable, local development. To take that away will only benefit multinational corporations that can already outbid local firms and that will get new tools in CETA to challenge local decisions that don’t go their way.”
“Cities will also lose out if Harper agrees to pharmaceutical intellectual property rights changes that are guaranteed to increase the cost of public drug plans and the cost of drugs,” notes Stuart Trew, Trade Campaigner with the Council of Canadians.
Canada and the EU have held over 10 rounds of comprehensive trade and investment negotiations since October 2010 with smaller talks scheduled in the coming months. The Council of Canadians is one of over 60 organizations in Canada and Quebec calling on the provinces and territories to provide an outlet for public dialogue on the actual content of the CETA negotiations prior to a final deal being signed at some point in 2013. Municipalities across Canada are also seeking information from provincial and territorial governments about what has been included in CETA, but the full contents of the trade deal have not been disclosed.
The Canadian Progressive recommends:
- Council of Canadians: We need a “Great Free Trade Debate” on Canada-EU trade deal
- Canadians oppose drug patent extension in Canada-EU trade deal: POLL
- Harper’s CNOOC/Nexen deal pushes Canada closer to becoming a China-dominated petro-state
- Elizabeth May wants CSIS to weigh in on Canada-China treaty
Latest posts by Guest Blog (see all)
- David Suzuki: Eating less meat will reduce Earth’s heat - May 20, 2016
- David Suzuki: Divest from damage and invest in a healthier future - May 8, 2016
- Whistleblowers and leak activists face powerful elites in struggle to control information - April 9, 2016
- Michael Geist: Why Journalism is not Dying in the Digital Age - February 27, 2016